Aerial photography - Ancient Gallery
This
installation was located in an area where ghosting,
or multipath reception, was a problem. The large array with three
long elements was for Band I channel 2, vertical polarisation.
The middle element was driven, with a reflector to the rear, these
two together forming the familiar H aerial. The addition
of a director improved the forward gain and thus the directivity.
Some three element band I aerials had a folded dipole for better
cable matching.
Near
the top of the mast was a Group A UHF array, horizontally
polarised. This was an example of the 1960s Antiference design
that had a balun hanging under the dipole, with the cable swinging
in the breeze. Note that the UHF array was directed in roughly
the opposite direction to the VHF arrays. This would be because
the ghosting at UHF from the local transmitter was intolerable,
forcing the use of a more remote UHF station. This was quite a
common situation. One of the first things we learnt when UHF came
along was that in a given location, the ghosting at UHF would
always be much, much, worse than at VHF. The UHF array is really
much too close to the VHF elements, but that sort of compromise
was common in those days.
The
Band III aerial (for channel 10, vertical) was unusual, because
stacked pairs normally had 8 or 11 elements on each side. In this
case there were five. Note the parallel wires used to form a transmission
line. The feeder cable was connected centrally across them. Stacked
arrays were often used to combat ghosting. Because of the large
physical size of VHF aerials it wasnt possible to improve
directivity by adding large numbers of elements, so exploiting
the phase cancellation properties of a stacked pair was a much-used
technique.
Its
interesting that the neighbour manages with a much more modest
installation. The dipole and five was just about the
least ghost-resistant array ever made!
|
Previous |
|
Next |
|
|