Channel planning for distribution systems, and the n+9 and n+5 conundrums explained When planning a distribution system you should, if possible, avoid having signals on channels five or nine channels apart. Thanks to modern TV receiver design the problems caused by these channel combinations are far less important than they used to be, but nevertheless it’s worth avoiding these channel spacings if you can, especially if the system will feed any older TV sets. The channel plan for systems that carry both analogue and digital signals should also avoid these channel relationships where possible, treating both analogue and digital signals as potential interferers. A useful chart for plotting your channel usage can be found here. On a system using DSB (double sideband modulators) for in-house analogue channels a common practice is to use every second channel. This automatically avoids n+5 and n+9, except that DSB modulators produce a lower sideband, which is actually a mirror of the output channel and is centred on the vision carrier frequency. This sideband extends some way across the lower adjacent channel, so a system using every second channel for a DSB modulator effectively has something on every channel, making n+9 interference a possibility. However, the channel filters that should always be used to combine modulator outputs reduce these unwanted lower sidebands somewhat, so the problem is greatly reduced in practice. If the system also carries a standard broadcast group of analogue signals the sequence of n, n+2, n+4, n+6 etc will probably have n+5 or n+9 clashes with one or more of the broadcast signals. This means that a channel in the ‘every second channel’ sequence might have to be left unused. Years ago it was out of the question to use adjacent channels, but with modern TV sets a system using VSB modulators (which suppress the unwanted lower sideband) for the in-house channels will probably use every channel (n, n+1, n+2, n+3, etc). Such a system will obviously have n+5 and n+9 channel clashes, but it can work perfectly well as long as the TV sets are modern and are free from vices, such as radiating their IF excessively or being susceptible to interference from signals nine channels above the one being viewed. It’s always interesting when adjacent channel working is imposed on an existing system that hasn’t had it before, because it sometimes happens that certain quite respectable looking tellys will be quite unable to cope, whereas some supermarket cheapies will be OK. Generally though, the Panasonics and Sonys and similar sets will handle the adjacent channel input best. The cause of the n+5 problem The cause of the n+5 problem is that the local oscillator of a TV receiver runs at 39MHz above the channel it is tuned to. 39MHz roughly equals five channels, so if the local oscillator radiates it can cause interference to a nearby set that is tuned to a channel five above the one received by the first set. The cause of the n+9 problem The n+9 problem is sometimes called ‘image’ interference. Ray Cooper wrote — in his inimitable style — a rather good explanation of the phenomenon, which I reproduce below.
There endeth the words of Ray Cooper. Thanks for that Ray. |
Home | About us | What we do | Aerial Issues | Aerial Photography | Reference | Contact Us | Annexe | ||||||
Print this page | © 2003-2012, Wrights Aerials | Add to Favorites |